Cessation of Spontaneous Burst Activity Following Application of Anti-Convulsants on Living Neural Networks Cultured on Micro-Electrode Arrays
(Abstract)One of the most prominent features of the
activity of neurons in culture is the appearance of
repetitive quasi-synchronized clusters of action potentials
often referred to as bursts. These bursts occur every few
seconds and can typically continue for 100 ms to over a
second and are reminecent of epileptic seizure activity in
vivo. This has led some to suggest that in vitro bursting
and epilepsy my share a common cause. Since a wide variety
of antiepileptic drugs (AED) exist to treat the symptoms of
epilepsy (i.e. prevent or reduce seizure activity) in vivo,
, one natural prediction would be that to the extent that
seizures in vivo and those in vitro are similar, they
should have a similar affect in vitro. That is, these AEDs
should also be highly effective in modulating the burst
activity in vitro as well. To test this prediction the
effect of three of the most common AEDs on the market:
phenytoin, ethosuximide, and valproate, were delivered to
in vitro rat cortical neurons cultured on 60 channel
micro-electrode arrays (MEAs). With these arrays, neural
activity (single unit action potentials) at 60 sites across
the network was measured before and after the delivery of
each AED. Phenytoin, used for grand mal seizures, was the
most effective of the three drugs eliminating spontaneous
bursts entirely. Ethosuximide, used for petit mal seizures,
and valproate, used for various forms of epilepsy, reduced
but did not eliminate spontaneous bursts. A comparison of
the network’s evoked response to single site
stimulation pulses indicated that even though phenytoin had
effectively eliminated spontaneous bursts, it did not
eliminate bursts of activity. It did however, reduce the
number of action potentials that contributed during the
bursts. In contrast, Ethosuximide and valproate had no
affect on either the duration or the number of action
potentials with each evoked burst. Together, these findings
suggest a connection between in vivo seizure and its’
in vitro analog.